Don’t Buy Springbank Whisky!
If this was a YouTube video, then the title would make
terrific clickbait. But let me now explain what I mean.
This is a prelude article to set the context for the main
Springbank 5-Year-Old 100° Proof (57.1% ABV) review. It’s a way of getting the
controversial current market issues out of the way beforehand, instead of
bloating the main whisky review where I am supposed to be concentrating on the actual whisky's tasting notes.
For a general introduction to the whiskies of the Campbeltown region, please see my article on Glen Scotia 10,
here:
Introduction
Springbank, found in the heart of
the town of Campbeltown, was founded in 1828 by the Mitchell family and is
still owned and managed by their descendants under the company name of J&A
Mitchell & Co., making it the oldest independent, family-owned distillery
in Scotland.
However, as far as uniqueness
goes, we are just getting started. Springbank is pretty much universally
recognised as one of, if not the most respected, admired and dare I say,
worshipped distilleries in Scotland.
For example, you won’t find a
single computer used in its entire whisky production. Calculations of amounts
and temperatures are recorded with chalk on blackboards. One hundred percent of
the malted barley it uses comes from its traditional malting floor, still
processed using basic, manually operated equipment. It still uses direct fire
heating for its stills and cools the spirit using copper worm tubs. The entire
whisky making process is done on-site, from malting the barley and local warehouse
maturation to bottling and labelling. What’s more, they have an active social
community responsibility policy to only hire locals.
Not only do they insist on keeping
everything authentic and traditional, they even make sure to state either on
the label or their website which type casks are used in all their releases.
There are many distilleries around
Scotland such as Bruichladdich, Kilchoman, Glen Scotia, Benromach,
Craigellachie etc, that can boast one or even two or three of these practices
but none but Springbank can claim to do all of them.
The many dedicated and zealous Springbank
fans will eagerly inform you that the distillery operates as a living time
capsule of traditional Campbeltown whisky making, with its world famous
Campbeltown industrial style oily, maritime and “funky” style of whisky.
What’s more, the distillery
doesn’t just stick to one kind of Single Malt but is committed to keeping these
historical Campbeltown whisky styles alive. To that end, they produce these
three very different types of whisky, preserving the names of long ago closed
Campbeltown distilleries.
The Three Types of Single Malt
Whiskies:
Springbank: Lightly peated and distilled 2.5 times using a highly unique, complex system of mixing low wines and feints.
Longrow: Heavily
peated (50–55 ppm) and double-distilled, creating a powerful, intensely smoky,
Islay-style dram.
Hazelburn: This is
Irish style whisky, being completely unpeated and triple-distilled, resulting
in a light, delicate, and fruity flavour profile. By the way, Campbeltown is
only 70 miles from Ireland as the crow flies.
No wonder that Springbank is
ranked by so many whisky enthusiasts as the World’s Greatest Distillery. The one
distillery that you can put your faith into always prioritising “Integrity” bottlings
with the highest uncompromising quality over any commercial considerations.
You’d think that with a pedigree like
this, Springbank would be at least in my top ten personal favourite
distilleries and I’d be talking about it all the time. After all, don’t I go on
and on about wanting more integrity and transparency in the Scotch Whisky
industry? Don’t I constantly campaign for 100% full disclosure in the industry
when it comes to cask types used for maturation so that the strictly kosher
consumer can know immediately what they can and cannot purchase? Instead, as long-time
readers of my website will know, I have hardly ever mentioned this distillery.
But why?
Why in over 15 years of writing
about all thing’s whisky have I never written a review of Springbank? Why have I
effectively consigned this distillery and the spirit it produces to the filing
cabinet of insignificance?
The Ardnamurchan Syndrome?
From merely a kashrus point of
view, even had I wanted to, there is a very simple reason why I wouldn’t have
reviewed too many Springbanks. That is, because it suffers somewhat from what I
call the “Ardnamurchan” syndrome!
Despite the fact that if you walk
into the warehouses of both Ardnamurchan and Springbank distilleries (as I have
done), you’ll see rows and rows of Bourbon barrels sitting there quietly
maturing, both these distilleries’ default house styles are various marriages of
Ex-Bourbon and Ex-Sherry (or wine) casks. Vattings vary from 80%/20% ratios,
others are 70%/30% but because they include a significant percentage of
First-Fill Ex-Sherry casks, it is these casks that will dominate the overall
flavour of the expressions, rendering them “Not Approved” by many Poskim.
Despite thoroughly enjoying their
private distillery tour and tasting session back in November 2021, where I got
to sample the contents of a few of their Bourbon and Rum barrels, I’ve been nagging
both the guys at Ardnamurchan as well as kvetching to fellow whisky
enthusiasts, that they really should release an edition that is exclusively
Ex-Bourbon.
Some of you might remember that I
reviewed a Limited-Edition Rum Cask from Ardnamurchan that I managed to pick up
in Scotland some time ago. This was, up until now, the only “kosher” option
available from them.
Well, I am delighted to inform you all that as of the time of writing, not one hour ago, I took delivery of two bottles of Ardnamurchan’s latest release - The “AD Heritage Barley 2025” which is 100% Ex-Bourbon barrel matured and currently available here in Israel to boot, through the Whisky Embassy in Herzliya. (Bli Neder, I’ll let you know how I get on with this very soon).
However, Springbank have produced a
few Ex-Bourbon and Ex-Rum Cask expressions over the years but I’ve never
reviewed any (at least up ‘til now). Besides, the Ardnamurchan Syndrome is not
the reason why I rarely talk about this distillery.
The Real Reason Why I’ve Been
Ignoring Springbank
The Art of Flipping
When I visited the distillery for
the first time back in 2019, I found three bottles in their shop that had no Stam Yeinam cask influence and bought all three to try. These
are the tasting notes of two of them from that time:
Hazelburn 10-Year-Old. 100%
Ex-Bourbon, 46% abv
This is considered part of their
basic core-range but as I soon found out, looking online then (and things have
only got worse since then), you couldn’t find it anywhere for its RRP of under
£60. Instead, doing a Google, you’d find specialist whisky shops and auctions
selling this 10-Year-Old for 3-4 times the distillery price.
By the way, Springbank distillery has
no online store. It simply lists the editions on its website that are
theoretically available either at the distillery shop or with suppliers around
the world. So, in order to buy at their RRP, you’d have to physically go to the
distillery (or send someone else) to purchase your bottle.
Longrow (Peated) NAS Edition. 100%
Ex-Bourbon, 46% abv
On the nose it has an unpleasant burnt plastic bag smell with burnt electrical cables.
Harsh
spirit even with water added. You’d be hard pressed to get even a hint of
fruit.
It’s
oily in the mouth, like old engine oil. It’s actually quite palatable with ice,
revealing some lemon grind. I must admit that after a few months it did improve
somewhat but, bli neder, I won’t be buying this again.
This is also considered part of
the basic core-range. You can dafka, purchase
this in some online stores today for around £50, but in my opinion, I wouldn’t
bother, either drinking or investment wise.
Springbank 15-Year-Old Rum Wood Cask.
51% abv
This 15-Year-Old Rum Cask cost me £65 in the distillery. My first introduction into the sordid world of Springbank “flipping” was when the distillery staff told me that I could only purchase a single bottle of this. I usually buy two bottles of anything I want to review - one to open and one to keep as an historical record. This time however, I would have to make do with just one.
When we got back to our self-catering
chalet along the A83 which serves the length of the Kintyre peninsula, I looked
up just how problematic Springbank bottle flipping was. I was astonished to see
that this very bottle of 15-Year-Old Rum cask that I had just purchased had quadrupled
in value the moment I stepped outside the distillery.
Indeed, looking back on it, I do
seem to remember seeing some guys that didn’t exactly look like whisky
enthusiasts, “visiting” the distillery and buying bottles, then promptly
leaving, as if they were visiting the local off-license. (A British term for a
shop, often a small high-street food store but sometimes a specialist wine and
spirits place, that is also licensed to sell alcohol for consumption “off the
premises”. Many of them have a seedy reputation of men walking into the store
and coming out with a bar of chocolate and a brown paper bag containing a
bottle of something).
I learnt later that these men leave the distillery and meet up with either an investment broker or agent or perhaps someone from a specialist whisky shop, selling them the bottles and making an immediate profit of four times the RRP. Often, they’ll sell them to middle-men who will ship them to Asia and other parts of the world. When they arrive there, they are sold for six or eight times the original distillery price. This, ladies and gentlemen, is what’s known as “flipping”.
This is what Google says
about “Flipping”:
"Flipping" in the
whisky industry is the practice of buying highly sought-after rare bottles at
retail price and immediately reselling them on the secondary market for a
rapid, often massive profit. Driven by the global obsession of collecting
bottles of whisky from certain distilleries such as Springbank and Macallan,
this phenomenon mirrors “ticket scalping” or sneaker collecting.
No wonder that this Springbank
15-Year-Old Rum Wood Cask is still sitting in my display cabinet in 2026. Current
auction values are now heading towards the £1,000 mark. At prices like these, I
wouldn’t even think of opening it even for a big simcha. Besides,
no one would appreciate it, not even me. So, it sits there in my glass cabinet
until I decide what to do with it.
As Rare as Hen’s Teeth
So, I looked on The Whisky Exchange website, London based and probably the biggest online whisky store in the world with up to 10,000 bottles in stock at any time. They have the Longrow (Peated) NAS Edition in stock and that's it at the RRP. I can understand why flippers wouldn’t be interested in this. Then, clicking on “List by Low to High”, the next bottle of Springbank is £400 and that’s not even an official bottling but an independent bottle from Signatory. Official bottlings start at £500, then jump up to £800 and then get into the thousands.
Master of Malt, considered the second biggest online whisky store, has a slightly better choice. They feature three bottles at around £150 (unfortunately, none of them suitable for the strictly kosher consumer), and after these, the price jumps up to £400, then £500 and then we get into funny-money territory with four figure prices. Are you beginning to see a pattern here?
When it comes to Springbank, what does a “core range”
actually mean? It certainly does not mean “widely available”!
In my opinion, you cannot even compare Springbank bottlings
to Limited Editions like an Official Bottling Single Cask or similar from independent
bottlers, because although there might also be only a few hundred bottles of
that specific bottling, there’s always something similar that will replace it when that
Single Cask Edition runs out. Springbank on the other hand, seems Out-Of-Stock almost everywhere on an almost permanent basis.
Demand Outstrips Capacity
According to the Malt Whisky
Yearbook 2026, Springbank has the theoretical capacity to produce around half a
million litres per year. That makes it more than “boutique” but still a relatively
small Scottish distillery. However, by their own admission, Springbank only
produce a fraction of that capacity each year. Annual output runs at just over
200,000 litres. When asked why they intentionally under produce, they say that
they “wish to preserve their heritage by doing everything on-site and manually”,
and they have no wish to keep the distillery running 24/7. This family run and
community sensitive distillery will tell you that they want their workers to
have regular “Nine to Five” working hours.
So, unless you are willing to shlepp to the distillery in Campbeltown, the only way
you’ll get to buy and try Springbank is to pay hundreds and sometimes thousands
of pounds in specialist online shops or from investment brokers. This is
because their (although greatly admired) doggedness policy of sticking to old
manual traditional whisky practices using only the malted barley from its tiny
malting floor etc., inevitably severely limits the amount of whisky the
distillery can produce every year! That means that almost every expression they
release becomes a rare collectable as soon as its bottled and leaves the
distillery.
The Springbank 5-Year-Old 100°
Proof 57.1% vol
But, what of their latest
Springbank Edition – The Springbank 5-Year-Old 100°
Proof 57.1% vol? It’s unusual in so many ways. It’s the first new so
called “core-range” (see my comment above), addition since they launched the Hazelburn
10-Year-Old back in 2014, marking a gap of 11 years. For any other
distillery, that would be commercial suicide.
Along with its release back in
August 2025, they issued a statement saying that in order to combat global
scarcity and high demand [in other words, they mean “flipping”], the distillery
is now producing this Springbank 5-Year-Old 100° Proof 57.1% vol
bottle as a “permanent” quarterly annual release.
Another unusual aspect of this
release is the Age statement. They proudly state “5-Year” on the font label.
The only other established distillery to do this as far as I am aware, is
Ardbeg with their “5-Year-Old Wee Beastie” Edition. (Of course, this
does not include the new distilleries such as Ardnahoe, Lochlea, Torabhaig and Bonnington
who have only been maturing whisky for a few years that release with age
statements of three, four, five and six years).
No doubt, this young age statement
from Springbank is a further attempt to dissuade the “collectors”. Will all
this go somewhere to solving the flipping problem? (No double entendre
intended). Will everyone (more or less), now be able to get hold of at least
one expression of Springbank? At just 5 years old, does this edition even
qualify as the genuine Springbank flavour experience? All this and more will be
covered in part 2 of this article.
Distillery of the Year? Perhaps Distillery
of the Century?
Whenever whisky reviewers make
Springbank their “Distillery of the Year” or crown a particular Springbank,
Longrow or Hazelburn as their “Whisky of the Year”, I have been first in the
comments section, politely but forcefully questioning the distillery’s eligibility
for such awards.
I am left wondering if Springbank should even be considered for these accolades because 99% of enthusiasts cannot actually buy their bottles. Furthermore, the usual flood of online votes for Springbank products every year on the OSWAs website really puzzles me. The organisers must surely know that only a small minority of those voting could have possibly ever tasted a drop of actual whisky from this distillery. How legitimate are these votes if those voting haven’t actually experienced the whisky themselves but are instead voting vicariously based on reputation alone?
It's like awarding “Best Car of
the Year” to a British car company down in Cornwall that hand builds five cars
a year. As far as even premium car buyers are concerned, that company may as
well not exist. Surely the award should go to a company that manufacturers car
models that it is at least possible to obtain?
It seems that these awards are
grading the liquid purely as an artistic achievement in a vacuum. To them, if a
whisky tastes unique and “flawless”, it somehow deserves the trophy, even if
only 500 bottles exist in the world and the majority have all been bought and locked
up in some investors' safe.
A true "Product of the
Year" should be a triumph of both quality and accessibility.
These awards should reward a distillery for delivering an exceptional
experience to the actual community, not just to a handful of ultra-wealthy whisky
drinkers to stock the cabinet of their private jets and premium whisky lounges in Asia
and the Middle East.
Now, I want to be clear about
something. Chas VeShalom, I am in no way saying that Springbank
distillery is irrelevant. On the contrary, they remain the Scotch Whisky Industry's
ultimate ideal, living proof that uncompromising perfection still exists in a
highly corporate world. Their operations may defy modern economic logic, but
they set a standard of purity that forces every other distillery to aim higher.
In my personal opinion, Springbank
is an essential treasure of the entire whisky world - a monument to be revered
rather
than an eligible contender for awards in a consumer and profit driven marketplace.
Springbank Alternatives
Lastly, for those seeking a
comparable (in terms of quality), Single Malt Whisky from the "Premier
League" of Scotch Malt distilleries but one you can actually buy, then there
is Baruch Hashem, plenty of choice.
Look to Bruichladdich, Lochranza
(Arran), Ardnamurchan, Ardnahoe, Kilchoman, Glasgow 1770, or Benromach. There
is also Kilkerran from Glengyle, Springbank’s own sister distillery. For the
time being, Kilkerran remains much more accessible simply because it hasn't yet
been swallowed up by the collectors' market.
As direct Springbank alternatives, Kilkerran, along with Glen Scotia are the perfect choices. Both will give you that genuine Campbeltown funky coastal style flavour profile without the accompanying price-tag.
So, unless
you are actually planning on visiting the distillery any time soon (which I intend to cover in Part 2), then there’s really no need to spend these ridiculous amounts of
money just for that Springbank label.
















Fascinating and eloquently presented
ReplyDeleteThanks Lawrence. Have you ever tried Springbank yourself?
DeleteBeautifully written and very interesting, (Moshe Katz, Israel)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the kind words my friend. I was looking through the article an hour after I published it and noticed a few mistakes. I corrected a few things but you know, we should celebrate these mistakes as it's proof that an AI didn't write it. I asked Google Geminit yesterday what percentage of Whisky reviews online are actually AI generated. It reckoned some 75% of whisky reviews are AI auto generated and 65% of whisky articles.
DeleteDear Mordechai, my sincerest apologies for my blackout. I've had so much on my plate I've eased off so much communication and chat. I'll be in touch privately with an update. It's taken me a while to juggle all the balls in my work and social life but here I am. I know you would never stoop to clickbait but what you say about Springbank is close to my heart.
ReplyDeleteHave I ever drunk Springbank? The answer is yes and lots of it. All of it was easily available until about 8 years ago. I've echoed what your argument many times over the years and did so again on a Ralfy Extra recently. He read out my observations but defended the distillery. My key issue, the most obvious really, is you can't buy it. It makes no difference how good it is if it's unavailable. Allocation in retail is minimal and reserved for customer favourites and staff. I recently came across three bottles of the 10 in a shop window and they were £160 a bottle. Who on earth is stupid enough to pay that? Well, there might be a cretin who thinks Springbank is so good because of the reputation (and they've never tasted it) so they just have to do it. I managed to get a bottle but I had to get the Campbelltown Loch with it, which I didn't want, for about £100 for the two. The shop was selling the 5 in a similar package but I bought the 10. I have to say it was an excellent batch.
It should not be included in competitions because people can't buy or taste it. Furthermore, people are entirely uncritical of it. I've had sulphured Longrow 18 and Springbank 15 in the past. Their Organic 13 was below par too. These days nobody would say so because of ownership bragging rights. I even complain about Springbank's distribution. Folk in the US and Canada seem to pick it up in shops whilst people in the UK can't. Springbank are aware of the overall dynamic and I think they exploit it.
Thank you so much for your comment. I'm glad that I'm not the only high profile whisky enthusiast willing to call this out. Welsh Toro, you are a legend!
Delete