Yerushalmi "Burnt Offering" - Batch 1 Review
Yerushalmi Burnt Offering - Batch 1
This is the first official bottling from the Yerushalmi distillery which uses the phrase “Single Malt Whisky”. Previous bottlings have only been labelled “Single Malt” without the word “Whisky” (spelt without an ‘e’ like Scotch).
There are as yet, no actual legally enforced Israeli government Whisky regulations in place, nor any plans to implement any. However, the three largest distilleries in Israel, namely M&H (Milk & Honey), Golani and Yerushalmi distilleries, to their great credit, comply with the UK Government’s Scotch Whisky Association - SWA Regulations regarding labelling standards and legally defined whisky terms.
This is the reason why Yerushalmi did not use the word “Whisky” for its earlier bottlings, as, according to the SWA regulations, the spirit must have been matured in Oak Casks for a minimum of three years to be legally termed “Whisky”.
As far as I understand, they could have chosen to use the word “Whisky” on their labels for spirits which had been matured for less than three years, and it would not have broken any Israeli regulations. However, they chose not to do this.
Despite the fact that it isn’t stated on the label, the manager and owner, David Zibell informed me in a WhatsApp interview, that this “Burnt Offering Batch 1” release is just over three years old.
The reasons why these Israeli distilleries agree to comply with the SWA regulations is that it gains the respect of whisky enthusiasts all over the world, and enables their products to be exported world-wide whilst complying with local regulations.
See: Scotch Whisky Regulations 2009: Guidance for Producers and Bottlers
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2009/2890/contents/made
https://www.scotch-whisky.org.uk/media/1519/swr-guidance-for-bottlers-and-producers.pdf
Label Guide. Click to magnify. |
So, when seeing any of these terms on the label they will be instantly recognised and understood by all whisky enthusiasts throughout the world. It’s a very sensible approach.
Unfortunately, there are some spirits producers here in Israel who are not as respectful for either the SWA regulations for whisky or for the US Code of Federal Regulations Title 27, CFR 5.1 for American style Whiskey. Consequently, if or when they try and import their products into Europe and North America, they may well fall foul of government regulations.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/27/5.143
For instance, as far as I understand the regulations, you cannot use the term “Bourbon Whiskey” on the label if the spirit was made in Israel, even if it was made in the exact same way as they make Bourbon in the US, as “Bourbon” as a type of whiskey, is a protected legal term for a type of whiskey exclusively made in the United States. This definition “Made in the United States” includes not only the distillation and entirety of the maturation process in oak “containers” (yes, for some reason the regulations say “container”, not “barrel” or “cask”), but also the definition includes the bottling, which has to be done in the United States too.
So, let’s say, for example, hypothetically speaking you understand, a particular distillery here in Israel decided to import barrels of whiskey from a Bourbon distillery in the United States into Israel and after storing the whiskey in the barrels here in Israel for a further few months, then proceeded to bottle and label the whiskey in Israel. My understanding is, this would not be legally recognised either in Europe or North America as “Bourbon”. This is despite the fact that had the contents of the barrels been bottled in America (instead of being transported to Israel), then they could have even legally called it “Straight Bourbon” (as our hypothetical whiskey had already aged in barrels in the US for two years).
Moreover, if these same barrels which have already been used to age the whiskey in the United States, were brought to Israel where the whiskey continued to mature in the same barrels, this would NOT be called a “Finish” or “Double Maturation”, because a Finish requires a change of casks (usually from less active to more active casks such as Refill Ex-Bourbon to First-Fill Ex-Sherry) and has nothing to do with change of location.
For instance, if Diageo moves some casks from the warehouse in their distillery to their main warehouse in Perth, before bottling, this would not be considered a “Finish”! The idea that it would be is, in my opinion, utterly ridiculous.
A hypothetical Whiskey Label. Click to magnify. |
So, let's say there was a Bourbon or "Bourbon Style” Whiskey, where it states on its label both “Small Batch” and “Single Barrel”! Obviously, these terms would be contradictory.
So, again, Kol HaKavod (Well Done!!!) to both Golani, Yerushalmi and M&H Distilleries for respecting the regulations in the UK as well as in North America.
Bottled at 55% abv
Non-Chill Filtered
Natural Colour
Peated at 55 PPM
Maturation: Ex-Beer Barrels and Charred French Oak Wine Casks.
Distillation Date: ? Not stated.
Bottled Date: 01/2023
Age: Although not stated (which is a shame), it is guaranteed over 3 years old.
Kosher Status: Certification from OK (America) organisation, as well as local certification by HaRav Yosef Levi, Chief Rabbi of Katzrin, Ramat HaGolan.
Price: NIS 275 (In Israel), £60 in the UK, $70 in the United States.
I had a brief WhatsApp conversation with David Zibell, regarding the “Burnt Offering” and he filled in a few gaps for me.
The barley used for this batch was peated in the Speyside region of Scotland and rated at 55 PPM.
I am aware of only one Scotch Single Malt range which also uses peated barley from the Speyside region. This is Tomintoul’s Old Ballantruan Single Malts consisting of their NAS, 10-Year-Old and 15-Year-Old. Strangely, all the Old Ballantruan expressions are also rated at 55 PPM! How about that for a coincidence! Hmm…
Old Ballantruan 15 |
Mainland Speyside peat delivers very different flavours to coastal peat (such as Islay or Orkney peat), with aromas and tastes roughly akin to having a barbeque in the forest, rather than on the beach by the sea. Mainland peat will give you aromas and flavours of burnt smoking twigs, tree moss and wood logs, as opposed to burnt seaweed, burnt engine oil and sea spray brine which are associated with coastal peat bogs.
In general, I like the overall style and artwork. The dark brown, almost black box with the red flames licking the top, is quite striking. I have already spoken about the gold lion emblem of Yerushalmi distillery. I still like it. The inside of the box contains a section from an old map of Jerusalem in red and black. The box holds the bottle securely and is easy to open. All Good!
The bottle itself is a lovely design with that red map reproduced around the bottle neck, adding the final touches to a very well thought out and balanced design.
I am not too keen however, on the name “Burnt Offering’. I realise that it draws a connection between peat smoke and the Temple in Jerusalem where animals were offered and burnt up. I must admit that I am being pedantic but technically, the “Korban Olah” or “Burnt Offering” was completely consumed on the mizbeach (alter) and not even the Kohanim were allowed to get any benefit from it. Whereas we certainly want benefit from drinking this lovely whisky!
I am not a fan of this “1 of 1150 Bottles” thing. Why not just say “Batch of 1150 Bottles” or such like. This “1” makes it look like this is bottle 1 of the batch, which it isn’t.
That same line which contains the Bottle amounts also states the Batch, which is No.1 and then the “Bottle Date” (or should it be “Bottled Date?) of 01/2023. What is missing however is the Distilled Date, which would tell us how many months this whisky had matured for. Indeed, there is no indication at all as to the age. It is only that I asked the owner who informed me that the whisky is just over three years old. So unfortunately, the lack of Distillation Date makes it a NAS (Non-Age Statement) expression, which is a shame.
The back label informs us that the whisky has been matured in Ex-Beer Barrels and Charred French Oak Wine Casks. (Are these STR casks? Probably).
The Tasting Experience
The natural colour I would describe a bright honey gold and clearly illustrates the fact that maturation was in Charred French casks. Compare this to the colour of the Old Ballantruan where they openly admit the use of E150a Caramel colourant. That fake dark toffee tan conceals the true colour of the Ex-Bourbon barrels which the whisky has been matured in.
Friday night, after the Smoked Salmon (extra Smokey from Cohen’s in Machane Yehuda) and Gefilte Fish, I poured a glass of the “Burnt Offering” for everyone at the Shabbos table. I gave a Dvar Tora on the Parsha for about 10 minutes and then, just before the main course, we were ready to try the Yerulshami.
First, we tried it without water.
Now, as many of you would know, with whiskies bottled at more than minimum legal alcohol of 40%, I automatically add a few drops of water before I even put the glass to my nose. This I would say, is an absolute must if you are dealing with spirits which are over 50% abv. The Yerushalmi is the exception to the rule.
On the nose, the first word that comes to mind is sophisticated. The nose is fully rounded and perfectly balanced. Sweet warm smoke with none of the pungency and brininess you would get from an island Scotch Whisky. Dark Raisins, Smokey BBQ tropical fruits. There is none of the typical peat aromas like burnt Engine oil and Wet Hay. Instead we have new Leather, the smell of inside a freshly drained Wine Cask, Smoked Honey, Smoked Strawberries, Dry Dates, cardamom, rosemary, wood-soaked red wine and hints of balsamic vinegar.
Despite its 55% abv, there is not a hint of nose alcohol pinch. However, I felt that even with all these wonderful aromas, this Burnt Offering was still holding back something.
Now I added water. Just a few drops, perhaps a quarter of a teaspoon. No more!
Wow! Wow! Wow!
The water has opened up a whole new experience. Suddenly with those bursted alcohol molecules, it has resulted in a dominant aroma of Sweet chewy Peated Barley. The fruit is still there, but now we have an added layer of complexity.
Perfume Flowers. Red Roses after a rainfall. Breakfast Cereal bar. Malted Brand Flakes with honey, sugar coated almonds and vanilla milk.
Please don’t forget that this whisky is only a few months older than three years, yet there is no spirit burn or new spirit smell at all. This shows none of the frisky characteristics of a typical young Single Malt. On the contrary, it gives the impression that this whisky has been aged in quality oak casks for at least 15-20 years. I kid you not.
Now, sometimes, a heavy Charred barrel can be used to add a coat of caramelised toffee woodiness in order to hide the youthfulness (immaturity) of a whisky. (A perfect example being the Tomatin Legacy). But David Zibell has managed to perform some kind of magic as the aged character of this whisky is far more than a mere coating.
Ooh, I’ll tell you the main problem with this whisky. You’ll want to pour yourself another dram to continue your flavour exploration. It reaches 10 on the “More-ish” scale.
Now, I understand why they neglected to include the Distillation Date. That would have made the “Yerushalmi Burnt Offering” perfect and being that this whisky also acts as a reminder of the destruction of the Holy Temple in Yerushalayim (May, Be'ezras Hashem it be rebuilt in our days), they have also added their own tiny defect.
Is there any info regarding the beer barrels are used? And are they french oak wine casks, or just French oak virgin casks
ReplyDeleteThanks for the questions. The whisky was distilled in Moshav Zanoach in Beit Shemesh, in the Moskava brewery but they dafka didn't use their barrels to mature the spirit. They used American Oak Ex-Beer barrels from OMG. Yes, the French Casks were Israeli Ex-Wine French Oak casks but I don't know from which winery they came from. I know that the Golani distillery buy from many wineries up and down the country. שבת שלום
DeleteI'm interested to know why you wanted such detailed information?
DeleteI always like to know as much as possible .The back of the label stated new French oak so wasnt sure if it was actual wine casks. And the beer casks, was just interested in the flavor. As I like beer, was more curious as to what type of beer and if the flavoring carried through at all.
DeleteI am glad to see you are back reviewing. I love your reviews especially for your definitions and explanations of terms and processes. So educational. Thanks, Ah Monsey Yid. (ps, it's shameful that you blot out faces in the background pictures. Either don't put the picture frane in your image, or just leave it alone)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the compliments. Keep the comments coming please. I stopped blogging for a while as I was busy with other whisky projects and frankly, was receiving so little feedback, I doubted anyone was reading my content.
DeleteRegarding the photos. Yes, you are right. I have stopped taking photos by the candlesticks as it caused Google to restrict my blog posts if it thinks it sees any photos of children. All my newer photos (like the Caperdonich), are taken either outside in the mirpeset with a Jerusalem stone background or on the dining room table. These photos of the Yerushalmi were taken last year so I simply used what I had, but blocked out the faces so as not to get banned.
Interestingly, I received a similar complaint a few months ago from someone else in New York who objected to me taking photos of whisky bottles in front of sifrei kodesh, like the Artscroll Talmud Babli set. He said this was also a "busha". I asked my Posek and he didn't think it was a problem at all, but nevertheless, I stopped doing this as well.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteShalom Aleichem Levi. I don't have the Koach to write any articles on whisky at the moment, due to current situation in Israel. BeSorot Tovot, Be'ezras Hashem, may we be Matzliach very soon.
Delete