Japanese Whisky and The Way of Kashrus
Japanese Whisky and The Way of Kashrus
ジャパニーズウイスキーとカシュルートの道
Recently I was asked by a distinguished
Kashrus Rabbi in South Africa for my opinion on whether
observant Jews could drink Japanese Single Malt Whisky without Kosher
Certification. (Actually, there are no Japanese Single Malt Whiskies, as
far as I am aware which currently have a reliable hechsher). I was
informed that Japanese Whisky happens to be really popular amongst members of
the Jewish community in that country.
As always, when asked this kind
of question, I replied that I was not a Posek (Decider of Jewish Law)
and could only try to give him the relevant facts for their Poskim in
South Africa to decide the kashrus suitability of Japanese Whisky.
As I understand it, the general
rule for AKO (Association of Kashrus Organisations) members is to give
an automatic “ishur” (approval) for all Single Malt Whisky from Scotland,
unless the whisky label, website or other official promotional material,
states that the Whisky was matured, even partially (or finished) in Ex-Sherry
or Ex-Wine casks.
When it comes to Japanese
Whisky, the most common question which I hear all the time from Orthodox Jewish
Whisky lovers, is whether, regarding Kashrus, the same general
guidelines set for Scotch Single Malt Whisky can also be applied to Japanese
Single Malt Whisky?
Important Disclaimer:
Before I reveal the results of my investigation, I want to point out that I was
not paid any money, neither was I given any other material
incentives by any party for what turned out to be around 80 hours of
research and I remain throughout completely independent.
As most of you reading this will
know, I only claim to be an authority on Scotch Single Malt Whisky and in
particular, Cask practices within the Scottish Whisky Industry.
See the link to download my book
“Sherry Casks Usage in the
Scottish Whisky Industry”
available as a free PDF file
here:
https://rebmordechaireviews.blogspot.com/p/single-malt-whiskies-matured-in-casks.html
Obviously, living in Israel, I
also have extensive knowledge of what’s going on in the local Israeli Whisky
scene (although I have avoided up until now, all national Whisky festivals due
to their total disregard when it comes to problems with Kashrus and Whisky).
Japanese Whisky
Japanese Whisky has never held
much interest for me up until now but I enjoy a good challenge. I approached
the subject in the same way as I would any Whisky kashrus question. I would
need to compile reliable data from acknowledged experts in the field and preferably,
get to speak to people who actually work in the industry.
I reached out to my fellow Whisky enthusiasts around the world which includes the top YouTube Whisky channel content providers.
Roy Duff runs one of the
most popular Whisky Channels, “Aqvavitae” on YouTube, Instagram and other
social media platforms. As well as his (in)famous “Recycled Whisky Reviews” (where
he stands by the Recycle bin in the garden of his home in Glasgow, a basket of
empty whisky bottles by his side, and proceeds to review the previous
contents of each bottle before un-ceremoniously tossing the bottle into the
recycle bin), he also hosts virtual world whisky events on his “vPub” live
events. Roy very kindly introduced me, via email, to Mac Salman (with an ‘a’, not
an ‘o’).
Mac Salman runs the No.1
Japanese Whisky YouTube channel, namely “Kanpai Planet”.
Originally from the city of
Exeter, England, he moved to Tokyo, Japan almost 20 years ago where he proceeded
to immerse himself in its culture and language. He became a tour guide there
and began to organise special tours to Japan’s whisky distilleries where he
developed a taste for the local product. He is now a noted writer and expert on
all things “Japanese Whisky”, has a close working relationship with the finest
and most influential Japanese distilleries and is closely associated with
Tokyo’s famous specialist Whisky bar, “Aloha”.
Mac, is what the British would
call, “a Gentleman and a Scholar”. We would call him simply a Mensch, メンシュ
or 紳士, pronounced “Shinshi”
Mac proved to be almost the perfect
person to ask my questions as it soon became clear from his videos and email
conversations, that he takes a very technical, pragmatic
approach to the subject, completely devoid of any “shtuyot”, pretentious
marketing flannel, twaddle, claptrap, and codswallop. He is a passionate
campaigner for more transparency, disclosure and government backed regulations
in the industry. (More about this last point later).
Japanese Whisky Tradition and General Practices
To get a full understanding of
the subject it’s worth reading this article on a short history of Japanese
Whisky, see here:
https://dekanta.com/a-short-history-of-japanese-whisky/
Japanese
Whisky Distilleries
There are currently (2022) 25 active
Whisky distilleries in Japan, (up from nine in 2010).
Most whisky is produced in the top
four largest distilleries on the islands, owned by the two biggest Japanese Spirits
companies in Japan (by far), namely Nikka and Suntory, who incidentally,
have been rivals and bitter enemies for over a 100 years.
Very much like the rest of the world
who are also going through the biggest whisky boom since the late 19th
century, there is an explosion of smaller independently owned distilleries which
are popping up all over Japan. They take the common route of opening up a
touristy visitor’s centre, even before their own whisky is ready to bottle.
However, by some magic it would seem, there is whisky available in their store
with their name on the label. This phenomenon goes on in the United States as
well with so called New York distilleries selling what we call in the trade,
“sourced” whiskey. That is, they buy whiskey of similar style to what they are
hoping to make, from a whiskey broker or large distillery from another state and
relabel it as their own. This goes on in Japan as well, but in their case, the
whisky is almost always sourced abroad, from America, Scotland, Canada and
Ireland.
As I will explain below, it is
important to emphasise that there is no legal requirement for them to disclose
the source of the whisky on the label, nor any other information about the
whisky.
Sherry Casks Used in The Japanese Whisky Industry
I started off by asking Mac Salman a
question which I can honestly say I’ve never asked before when talking to
someone about the Scottish Whisky industry.
Question: From your
knowledge of Japanese ritual practices, do any of their religious ceremonies
involve (grape based) wine? (I'm NOT talking about rice wine, just grape based
drinks)?
Answer: Traditionally they
do not
[My Comment: That's good to know!]
Next came the more typical Kashrus
related questions regarding Sherry Cask usage in Japanese Spirits companies.
Question: To your
knowledge, or have you actually witnessed distilleries directly pouring grape-based
wine or the like, into empty casks, or casks containing maturing whisky or
seasoning casks with wine before filling with new-make spirit or re-racking
with whisky? If so, how common is this practice?
Answer: It is not common
in Japan, but distilleries might season casks with wine in order to provide a
finishing option. They would be more likely to have purchased such casks from
overseas. I do not think anyone is adding wine to a cask with new make in it.
Question: By your
estimates, what percentage of the casks used to mature Single Malt Japanese
whisky where the previous contents of the casks was Wine/Sherry/Port or any
other grape based drinks?
Answer: I would estimate
about 30%. Your issue will be that often the full range of cask types is not
disclosed on the bottle: that this is not disclosed on the bottles.
[My Comment: This is a very
high figure compared to Scotland and shows that, despite the Sherry
casks costing around 5-6 times that of Ex-Bourbon or other type casks, the Japanese have a distinct preference for sweet Sherry casks].
Photo Courtesy of The Whisky Exchange |
[Mac continues:] For instance,
one of the most widely available and affordable single malts in Japan. The Yamazaki Distiller's Reserve Single Malt.
What exactly is in this bottle? [There is indeed nothing stated on the package].
As usual with a Suntory product, it’s a struggle to find out! The distillery
says that they don’t add Caramel colour to their whisky. However, an official
from Suntory wrote that they sometimes do add colour. There is no official
statement as to what casks are used in this Whisky. However, a source at the
distillery told me that it uses a percentage of Spanish Oak Sherry casks,
American Oak Bourbon casks and Japanese Oak Mizunara casks.
But then they add “components” aged in fresh Bordeaux Red Wine casks. These Red
wine casks are the main difference between this and the rest of the Yamazaki
core range.
[My Comment: In other words,
there is nothing whatsoever indicating this is Fresh Ex-Wine cask matured, yet
this is the dominant component].
Question: In general,
would a Japanese distillery disclose the Cask types it uses for its bottlings? If
a label or website states a particular cask maturation type for a release, how
much can you rely on that information? For instance, if they say "Matured
in Ex-Bourbon" or "Matured in Virgin Oak", how much can you
trust that there are no other cask types involved, for instance, First Fill
Sherry casks? Am I right in saying that there are NO regulations against NOT
disclosing this information?
Answer: You are
right. You do not need to disclose cask types, percentages etc. on bottles or
even when asked. I am often told it is manufacturing info. As you will see if you watch more of my
videos, I spend an inordinate amount of time trying to find out as much info as
possible.
Photo courtesy of dekanta.com |
With this whisky for example: The Kanosuke
2022 Single Malt Cask Strength. No Cask type is stated on the label or website whatsoever.
Some reviewers have stated that their sources claim that this is a 100% Sherry
Cask matured Whisky. However, when I asked for an official response, I received
the rather ambiguous reply in the form of the phrase "A number of barrel types with sherry as the key were used"
- this implies that sherry would be the biggest percentage, but that is not the
case at all! An inside source informed me that actually the majority of casks
used were Re-charred American Oak casks.
[My Comment: It might well be
that both sources are correct! In Scotland, the term “Re-Charred American Oak
Cask” sometimes includes seasoning with sherry as part of the rejuvenation
process. It could well be that these American Oak casks are in fact acting like
fresh First-Fill Sherry casks but for a fifth of the price of real Spanish
Sherry casks. Therefore, the Whisky could well be “a number of barrel types
with sherry as the key” component].
Question: I asked
you before, in your estimate, what percentage of casks used in the Japanese
Whisky industry are Ex-Wine/Sherry and you answered around 30%.
Now, I’d like to ask you a slightly
different question. What percentage of Japanese Single Malts bottled today DO
NOT contain any Ex-Sherry/Ex-Wine casks in the maturation?
Would I be right in saying that that
figure would be even lower than 30%? That almost all Japanese Single Malts
contain at least a percentage of Ex-Sherry/Wine casks? Also, could you give an
estimate of what percentage of these Sherry casks are First-Fil, Refill and
Re-Seasoned casks?
Answer: That number is probably around 10%. In Japan
they use both first fill and refill but which type is “most” is anybody’s
guess. As always, a lack of disclosure is our enemy.
Regarding whether First-Fill or Refill, if we look at the “Nikka
Sherry and Sweet” series that have quite an intense colour so I think they use
1st fills.
Photo courtesy of www.thewhiskyshop.com |
They may well use 1st fill for exclusives and the 2nd fills and
after for their blending components. The Big 2 also have no problem adding
E150A.
As mentioned many times before, disclosure especially for the Big
2 in Japan is not given or even expected in Japan.
[My Comment: So, even though there is no information about cask
types on the majority of Japanese Whisky labels, one must assume that there is
at least some Sherry cask maturation in almost all Japanese whisky, unless it
specifically states otherwise. This is certainly not the case in Scotland!
Moreover, don’t expect to get much information out of the distilleries]
Japan’s
New Whisky Regulations and how this affects Whisky Kashrus
I have heard the opinion made by some Rabbonim
who work in Kashrus organisations that due to the fact that Japan has
(or at least, will soon) establish strict Whisky regulations like they have in
Scotland, Ireland and America, that we can now apply existing halachic leniencies
based on assumptions we have for Scotch, Irish and American Whisk(e)y, to
Japanese whisky now.
Is this true? Can you rely on
information (or lack thereof) stated on the label or mentioned on the official
website? Can you make the same assumptions for Japanese whisky as you can for
Scotch? For instance, if there is no mention of Cask maturation type, can we
assume that it’s not predominantly Ex-Sherry or Ex-Wine cask matured? Is
there full disclosure, if an enquiry is made, as to the exact ingredients and
the country of origin of the contents of that bottle of whisky?
Let’s present the facts.
No one who knows anything about the
history of the Japanese Whisky world would argue that, before 2019, the
Japanese whisky industry has been notorious for its (and I’m not going to beat
about the bush here), frankly, totally misleading product descriptions. Every
bottle of Whisky from the major Japanese spirits companies was a master class in
marketing trickery skills and, of saying much and giving you no takles information.
Alcohol marked as Japanese whisky was
not legally required to even contain any alcohol made from mashed grain at all,
up until 1969. Instead, it was made of local rice mash or imported molasses
from South and Central America.
As Mac Salman explains, Japanese
whisky has become very fashionable over the past 30 years after a number of
very successful marketing campaigns, winning some International Whisky Awards
and being championed by some popular Whisky gurus.
Consequently, prices have shot through
the roof and caused a shortage or total draught of whisky which is made in
Japan. Due to the fact that there has been up until now, little to no
government standards surrounding the industry, Whisky Spirits companies have
solved the problem of a lack of stock by, shall we say, some very creative solutions.
The “Japanese whisky” is given some
traditional Japanese name and the bottle and box are decorated in traditional
Japanese artwork. Yet, there has been a total reluctance to divulge basic
ingredients, whether the whisky was simply bottled in Japan but was in fact
imported or “sourced” from a different country.
These very popular “Japanese” whiskies
actually won World Whisky of the Year awards.
“Nikka Whisky
from the Barrels” and “Coffey Malt Whisky”
Yet, it was exposed in British
newspapers in the 1990s, that a good percentage of the contents of these “Japanese”
whiskies is in fact sourced from distilleries in Scotland.
It should not escape your attention
that Nikka owns the Ben Nevis distillery in Fort William, Scotland and Suntory
owns Ardmore, Auchentoshan, Bowmore, Glen Garioch and Laphroaig Scottish distilleries.
Tomatin distillery is owned by a consortium of Japanese companies and other Japanese
companies have holdings in other distilleries. (We won’t even go into the
American, Canadian and Irish distilleries that Japanese spirits companies own!).
Would it therefore surprise you to
know that whisky is tankard into Japan in bulk from
abroad? This whisky is then (in the best case), vatted with locally made whisky
and sometimes is even bottled as is. Then it’s labelled as “Japanese Whisky” and
re-exported. The only legal requirement for labelling it as “Japanese” is that
the whisky must be bottled in Japan. Moreover, there is no legal requirement
for any disclosure of this fact.
[Editor’s comment: So much for
the headlines that Japanese Whisky is now superior to Scotch!]
from Mac's video “The end of fake Japanese whisky is here?” |
The origins of the new Japanese Whisky
Regulations
The advocacy group “The Japan Whisky Research Centre” has been pushing
for more transparency and regulations in the Japanese industry for years, to
bring the description of Japanese whisky in line with the reasonable
expectations and assumptions of Whisky drinkers which they would have for
Scotch Whisky or American Whiskey.
The new whisky regulations formulated
by the “Japan Spirits & Liqueurs Makers Association” (or JSMLA), which were
introduced in April 2021, should be the cause for great celebration, as, on the
face of it, it would appear that it brings the Japanese Whisky in line with the
Scotch Whisky and American Whiskey industry.
The regulations look similar to
regulations by the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA).
The Term Japanese Whisky is defined as:
- Raw ingredients must be limited to malted grains, other cereals grains and water, locally sourced.
- Malted grain must be used in the production of Whisky.
- Fermentation and distillation must be carried out in Japan. Alcohol must not exceed 95% abv.
- The Whisky must have been Aged in Wooden casks not exceeding 700 L and matured in Japan for a minimum of 3 years.
- Bottling must take place in Japan with a minimum abv of 40%. Only Caramel additive is allowed.
See "Legal Regulations" document:
http://www.yoshu.or.jp/statistics_legal/legal/pdf/independence_07.pdf
See also
https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2021/02/japan-whisky-issued-with-new-labelling-rules/
General Comments:
Any Wood can be used
It is interesting that the regulations
allow any type of wooden cask whereas the Scotch Whisky Industry limits the
wood to a member of the Oak family. This would allow for more exotic native
Japanese wood.
Three Years and Not Two Years
One of the major differences between the Scotch and American definitions of whisk(e)y is that Scotch can only be called whisky if matured in Oak for a minimum of 3 years. American Straight Whiskey on the other hand, only needs maturation for 2 years. (To be more precise, according to Title 27 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, using the term "Whiskey", requires no minimum maturation age whatsoever. The minimum 2 year requirement only applies if you wish to use the term "Straight Whiskey").
The Japan Whisky Research
Centre as well as many of the smaller distilleries have complained about this
stipulation because, unlike Scotland, Japan has a warm climate and experiences
faster maturation than in the much colder Scottish climate, arguably justifying
two years, like the Americans.
Koji cannot be used in the production
of Japanese Whisky according to the new rules.
Another interesting section is the
fact that the rules insist on the use of Malted barley in the saccharification (malted and mashed) process. This
process may be standard practice both in Scotland and America but, in Japan,
there is another type of saccharifier which does the exact same job and has
traditionally been used for Japanese alcoholic drinks like Sake and Beer for
generations. This is called Koji and is made from rice and soya fungus mold.
www.midosmiso.com/what-is-koji |
There are currently quite a few
Japanese whiskies wholly produced in Japan, which under the new regulations,
will no longer qualify for using the term “Japanese Whisky” due to the use of koji, instead of malted barley. This has caused a
lot of uproar from more traditional spirits producers in Japan who wish to make
Japanese Whisky a more culturally Japanese product and not just a knock off
copy of Scotch, which many of the big players in the industry are intent on
doing.
I asked a good friend of mine, a Mashgiach
who works in Japan and an expert in Japanese food products and he told me that
in general, there are no kashrus problems with Koji, which he explained, is
widely used in many Japanese products.
Rice based Whisky can no longer be
called Whisky
The regulations also prohibit any
Japanese made whisky which is distilled from rice (the staple ingredients of
the Japanese diet) mash instead of barley or other grains from calling itself
“Whisky”. Ironically, Rice distilled Whisky would comply with US regulations for
the definition of Whisky, and again, many would argue that the use of rice
rather than imported grain, produces a more culturally “Japanese” product.
So, in general, these new regulations
look very promising. However, please note that although all new products
are expected to abide by the regulations, the rules stipulate that all
currently existing products have until April 2024 to comply with the new
regulations.
Even so, it is surely a huge step in
the right direction. Right?
Well, here’s when we start to see some
major red flags!
Well, contrary to what many think, they
are not the same organisation as the “The Japan Whisky
Research Centre”, a completely independent group. The JSMLA are in fact a
trade union of the major Japanese Whisky producers, namely Nikka, Santory,
Kirin, Mars and Hibiki. It is, however, important to note that most of the
independent Whisky distilleries, who produce genuine Japanese whisky, are not
members of this trade union, nor were they asked to join. In other words, the
actual regulations were crafted by those very companies who are the major
importers of bulk whisky from abroad.
That means that all the other distilleries who are not members, can carry on with impunity, In other words, the so-called regulations would obviously only apply to those who are signed up members.
Photo courtesy of vhsfletchers.co.uk |
What makes things even more dodgy is
the fact that there are major members of this trade union, who also own smaller
distilleries which appear to run independently and therefore not subject to
these regulations. This allows these companies a “Get out of Jail Free Card” if they
wished to produce a product which does not comply with the regulations.
Well, the short answer is, yes! Afterall, it’s still whisky, just not Japanese whisky! The Guidelines stipulate that “somewhere”, there should be some kind of disclosure that this product is not in fact Japanese whisky. There are products out on the market now which are categorised as Japanese Whisky on the shelves in London and New York, but use a substantial amount of foreign whisky in the vatting. The Japanese labels might state that these are “World Whisky” and not specifically refer to them as “Japanese Whisky” but with all the Japanese cultural references and traditional name and writing on the packaging, one would be forgiven for not understanding this point. Other whisky produces say that it’s good enough to mention the fact that not all the whisky was made in Japan, on their website. Others interpret the regulations to mean that they would only have to mention it if directly asked the question in an enquiry to the company. Clearly there a bit of tightening up of the regulations still to do.
A Japanese crafted blend of Irish, Scotch, American, Canadian and Japanese whiskies (Photo Courtesy of albertwines2u.com) |
New York Times Headline from May 29 2020 |
Do the Regulations have Government Legal Backing and are there penalties for breaking the rules?
Again, the short answer is no! As of
the date of writing this, not yet at least. The Japanese Tax ministry is
talking about incorporating these trade union regulations into new government
legislation, but until this happens, the so-called rules are voluntary
agreements by trade union members, with no legal backing and most importantly,
there are no consequences and no penalties imposed for breaking these
regulations.
Can one rely on these Regulations in a
similar way to the SWA?
The answer is a resounding No!
1. That there is a substantial
percentage of the Japanese whisky industry which are not even signed up to
these regulations.
2. That the regulations are not
enforced by law and there are no penalties for failure to comply or being
caught pretending to comply or trying to circumvent the regulations.
3. Even with these regulations, there is
no enforcement for transparency on the label for country of origin of the
whisky in the bottle. This was one of the major incentives for setting up these
regulations in the first place! Being that, a lot of the whisky marked as
"Japanese" was in fact wholly or partially sourced in Scotland,
Ireland or North America.
As Mac says, “it's a long winding road”
but in some sense, at least in the short term, in my opinion, the introduction
of these non-enforceable and weak regulations are causing more damage than
good. At least before, one knew that it was a complete free for all and you
just accepted that you really had no idea what you were drinking or where it
came from. Now, you are being lulled into a false sense of security, thinking
that there are now regulations to enforce standards whereas the reality is that
there are not. It's simply a new facade of respectability.
I sent my comment to Mac for his opinion.
I asked him if he thought that my conclusions were too harsh of an interpretation?
He answered
“It is
harsh, but fair! As you saw in my update video on regulations, the big
producers expect consumers to take personal responsibility. However, the media
- both professional and amateur - has often reported these guidelines/standards
as "laws" or regulations, leading to a lot of misunderstandings and
false assumptions”.
If you watch Mac Salman’s videos, you
soon pick up on his major complaint regarding the Japanese Whisky Industry.
That is a total lack of transparency on the packages and an unwillingness for
disclosure of information of their product, even if asked.
From my 30 something years of experience
of traveling to Scotland and talking to representatives of the Scottish Whisky industry,
both distillery workers and company directors, I have found them to be very
open and chatty. With few exceptions, when I write to the companies for Cask maturation
types for their products, they are usually very forthcoming.
The Scots are more than willing and
very much enjoy talking about the most tiny and geeky details of how they go
about producing Whisky. You can see the pride they have for their national
drink. Furthermore, if they are unhappy with the product they are making or with
the parent company, they will not be shy about expressing their opinion.
As luck would have it, I happen to
have had a friend and neighbour, who is a Kashrus Mashgiach and
expert in Japanese food and drinks, who was in Japan on a work trip at the very
time I was researching this issue.
I asked my friend if, in his
experience as a Kashrus Mashgiach, when requesting relevant product information
like exact and detailed ingredients, whether the Japanese (in general) are willing
to volunteer and disclose pertinent information?
My Mashgiach Kashrus friend
replied:
Culturally, the Japanese can be a very
reserved, extremely private people. They are usually tight-lipped, secretive and
perhaps slightly paranoid about questions you ask. Especially when it comes to divulgence
of industrial or technical information. They sometimes refuse to give us
information we already know!
“Getting Information from the Japanese
is [sometimes] like trying to extract teeth.”
I realise this last section is not
very scientific to say the least and only my personal impression of the Scots
and Japanese. Nevertheless, it’s interesting that Mac and my Mashgiach
friend share the same frustration when it comes to Japanese product disclosure.
So, to answer the Rabbi’s question, whether in my opinion an observant Jew could drink Japanese Single Malt Whisky without Kosher Certification and rely on the same hehterim as Scotch Whisky:
The answer, from my research so far is, I would personally take a more machmir approach than the official AKO position and not drink any Japanese Single Malt Whisky unless it specifically states that it was exclusively matured in Virgin or Ex-Bourbon casks ,
Again, I am
not a Posek and this is not a psak Halacha. It’s my own personal
opinion.
As always in the world of Kashrus, I believe that there is the need to have current and correct information. As a so called authority in the subject of Whisky, I feel it is my obligation to bring that information to the Poskim, and those who are interested in the issues involved.
--------------------------------------------------
Sources
Used:
See the following Kanpei Planet videos:
The End of Fake Japanese Whisky is
here, but does it matter?!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMaqaWcwsaM&t=1s&ab_channel=KanpaiPlanet
What is Japanese Whisky?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=719z5EKzNsE&ab_channel=KanpaiPlanet
Japan's New Whisky Standards: 6 Months
On
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMljCqusrSs&ab_channel=KanpaiPlanet
Malt Whisky Yearbook
articles on Japanese Whisky and annual list of distilleries.
https://dekanta.com/a-short-history-of-japanese-whisky/
Appendix
Japanese Distilleries by Owner
Suntory
Yamazaki,
1923
Hakushu,
1973.
Nikka
Yoichi,
1934
Miyagikyo
(formerly Sendai), 1969
Hombo Shuzo Co., Ltd
Mars Shinshu,
1985
Mars
Tsunuki, 2016
Kirin Brewery
Mount Fuji or “Fuji Gotemba”, 1973
Ichiro Akuto
Chichibu 2, 2019
Kenten Co.
Ltd
Akkeshi,
2015
Sasanokawa
Shuzo Ltd
Akashi
Hyogo
Eigashima, 1984
Saitama Konosu
Hikari, 2020
Interesting reading.
ReplyDeleteBut please note , Japan is not Scotland and a “visiting kashrut rabbi” opinion - not necessarily truly reflecting on Japanese way of doing things.
Lichvod Rav Simantov. Your comment is duly noted, but as I said, it's just my impression from talking to Mac and my Kashrus Mashgiach friend, who as you know, spends a few weeks a year in japan. Does the Rav disagree with any of the facts I presented.?
DeleteIn your excellent report you dealt with few issues;
DeleteJapanese working standards, Scottish whiskey production in contrast to Japanese whiskey production and the Halachic ramifications all above have .
Obviously all this cannot be answered by a Yes/No reply…
Will be happy to discuss all this with you further