Auchendores Highland "Jerusalem Hills" Single Malt Whisky review
Auchendores Highland "Jerusalem Hills" Single Malt Whisky
A few blogs back, I reviewed the Ben Eideann
Fionain Jerusalem Mountains Cabernet Sauvignon Finish, remarkable for its
prestigious BADATZ Eida Chareidis Kosher Certification. For those of you
who are not familiar with kosher certifications, it’s considered by many to be
the “Rolls Royce” of hechsherim. (I would also assume it’s probably the
most expensive?)
I recognise that the Kashrus reliability of this single malt from an unknown distillery, finished in Israeli Wine Casks, is probably second to none. It’s a pity that the Ben Eideann wasn’t that great. If you look back at my review, I described it as a refreshing and tasty aperitif that lacked any maltiness or any kind of typical flavour character associated with Scotch whisky. It also tasted very diluted, far less than the 40% abv (which is the legal minimum) it states on the bottle.
So, I was intrigued when browsing the shelves of a wine shop near the Bar Ilan Junction in Yerushalayim, to see, next to the “Ben Eideann”s, some similar looking cartons, but titled “Auchendores” Single Malt.
Taking one down off the shelf, the first thing I noticed
were the words “Never Chill Filtered” in bold letters. (Interesting!)
Then I see that the Single Malt has been bottled at a much higher 46%
abv and has been finished in Kosher “Jerusalem Hills” red wine Casks, with the
same Badatz Eida Chareidis
hechsher on it. (OK, now you have my attention). The price was a very
reasonable (at least for Israel) 229 shekels. I am always on the lookout for
something unusual and interesting so it was “Tally Ho”, and taken to the
counter forthwith.
By the way, (as you can see from the photo), there was also
an American Oak Matured Auchendores with the same carton cardboard box style
and bottling profile. Why someone would be interested in this product, I have
no idea, unless of course, they only buy products with Badatz Eida Chareidis.
I can’t see the point of a product like this. Why would you buy a standard
bottle of American Oak Cask Bourbon matured single malt whisky from an unknown
distillery, matured for an unknown amount of years (almost certainly not many),
when you can buy any number of excellent Single Malts which are also 100%
Matured in Ex-Bourbon (and therefore have no Kashrus issues), where you do actually
know the name of the distillery from whence it came,
and the number of years it has been maturing in the cask, for the same price or
cheaper!?
“Boutique Whisky”
The bottle describes this as a “Boutique Whisky”. What does
that mean?
In the Wine World, a Boutique Winery is defined as a small,
craft winery where they produce less than 10,000 bottles a year. You don’t see
the term “Boutique Distillery” used in the whisky industry but you do see the
term “Micro Distillery”, which implies the same thing. However, this says
“Boutique Whisky”! I am reasonably confident the whisky comes from a large industrial
sized Highlands distillery where they produce hundreds of thousands of bottles
a year. I therefore assume that the term is another way of saying “Limited
Edition”? This is borne out by the fact that it states “1 of 1500 bottles” on
the label. Why they would use this strange term though, I am really unsure.
And now it’s time to play that game again:
From which Mystery Distillery does this Single Malt Come
From?
I brought the bottle home and started doing some research to
determine which distillery it was from. I started with the assumption that
Auchendores was from the same company who produce Ben Eideann, which I
concluded in my review of that whisky, came from Tullibardine distillery.
Googling the name “Auchendores”, the top result told me that it is the name of
an Avenue in Port Glasgow, along the A8 on the far left of Scotland. It is also
the name of a reservoir in Inverclyde, also near Port Glasgow. Incidentally,
there are no distilleries anywhere near there! The nearest seems to be Loch
Lomond further north. I shot off an email to the manager of Loch Lomond who
assured me that he had nothing to do with it. One down, 130 to go!
So, based upon my research on Ben Eideann and the almost
identical bottle type to Tullibardine, I began to work on the assumption that
Auchendores comes from the same distillery. An email from the manager of
Tullibardine first denied any connection with his distillery and then a second
email a few hours later, stated that, he had done some further investigations
and it seems that the whisky might possibly have come from his distillery after
all! He wrote that perhaps it was a special order for a private client who
supplied his own casks. (Say no more!).
404 Not Found!
I noticed that there was an Internet site printed on the box
so typed it into the URL field in order to perhaps get some more information,
only to receive the message 404 Not Found!
The Auchendores.com site, it seems, does not exist!
So I did a Domain lookup of the site and found it was
registered to the same person who registered the domain name “beneideann.com”.
So that confirms the connection.
I wrote to the domain owner and received a lovely phone call
from Yochanan. We chatted for over an hour and I managed to find out some
useful information.
When asked, Yochanan did not deny that the distillery where
all this work was done, was in fact Tullibardine, but as I had already had this
pretty much confirmed by the manager, I did not push the point. In general, as
far as I understand, it is the distillery who supplies the sourced whisky, who
requests anonymity and I had no intention of getting Yochanan into any trouble
with his whisky suppliers.
At this stage, I usually discuss the Packaging and artwork design so here goes.
On the Left, Auchendores. On the Right, a KN95 mask |
A Rather fiddly carton opening. |
In conversation with Yochanan, he informed me that he had
invested in a professional whisky industry designer, the same company which had
designed the Ileach Cask Strength Islay Single Malt whisky, which is produced by the “Highlands
and Islands Whisky Company”.
I told him that I really wasn’t impressed as there were, in my opinion, a lot of problems with the packaging.
The cardboard used to
make the box is too thin, flimsy and cheap looking.
The overall look of
both the carton box and label, looks bland, generic and uninspiring with most
of it in plain black and white. The main problem though is, besides the printed
name “Auchendores”, all the writing is absolutely tiny and made even more
difficult to read on that brown/maroon background. On the left, it says
“Jerusalem Hills” in gold but you would hardly notice it as it’s almost
invisible on that background. Even repeated photos from different angles failed
to make it clear.
The pencil like drawing of a Loch in front of a mountain is hardly emotionally rousing stuff. On the shelf, it is simply indistinguishable from so many other generic bottles.
There is no doubt
that this is a unique and special product and it needs something to show that
in the artwork. I’m not saying to plaster the words “Jerusalem Hills Kosher Red
Wine” and “BADATZ” in multi coloured letters all over the box, but it needs
something to establish it as a brand that stands out on the shelves which will do
it justice.
Regarding the text
at the back of the box, I was expecting something ultra-kitschy but was in fact
pleasantly surprised to find some really good information and pretty
descriptive and accurate tasting notes. The only thing missing is the fact that
this single malt, as well as being non-chill filtered, is also natural colour,
but it fails to mention this. Yochanan admitted that the absence of a statement
about this being without colouring, was an oversight.
So, in summary, we
need a design which:
1. Stands out on the
shelf and does not look generic.
2. Informs us that
it has a BADATZ hechsher at a glance.
3. Informs us on the
front in bold letters that this is premium single malt, that is, Non-Chilll
Filtered, Natural Colour and bottled at 46% abv.
4. That it’s been
matured in Kosher Israeli Wine casks.
This should get the pulse
racing of any Orthodox Jewish Single Malt Whisky lover!
Scotch Whisky
Branding Design
Interestingly, the subject of current Whisky packaging design was discussed on the Ralfy.com channel a few weeks ago, particularly in regard to the new repackaging “disasters” of the Benromach and BenRiach brands. We were all in more or less unanimous agreement that the once much loved unique packaging from bottle shape design to label artwork, which had established both brands, had now been rebranded into lacklustre bland generic lifeless looking products, indistinguishable from a hundred other bottles, all fighting for shelf recognition.
Whereas in the World of World Whiskies coming from say, Sweden, Australia, India and Israel, where they are all developing a brand look which stands out and makes them readily identifiable, the whole current trend in Scotch Whisky Branding design is going in the completely opposite direction and seems totally counterintuitive.I did like the cork and the paper seal that goes around it. This used the be very popular a few years ago but seems to have fallen out of fashion, so it’s a nice touch.
Auchendores Jerusalem red Wine Finish, 46% abv, NCF, NC, 230 Shekels.
Ah, did I mention
that it has a Badatz Eida Charedis hechsher? I can’t remember!
Appearance
The Auchendores seemed quite viscous as I swirled it around in the glass. I had the urge to place this
whisky in a Sherry Copita glass rather than a standard Glencairn and I feel it
suits it a lot better. The colour is a lovely light red-copper brown which
reveals perfectly its Red Wine finish. This is a fine looking Single Malt.
On the Nose
(As mentioned earlier), Yochanan informed me
that the Red wine casks used, previously contains Cabernet
Sauvignon from the Psagot winery. He isn’t sure but thinks it was vintage
2016. This is interesting as the overall flavour note of this whisky is red
fruity sweet and certainly not dry tannic red wine notes you might associate
with a young Cabernet Sauvignon.
It has really nice juicy, fruity sweet malty feel to it in the mouthfeel. It doesn’t seem that complex, but what flavours are there, are clear and distinct, and really
tantalising.
What I particularly enjoyed was the fact that the red wine
and malted barley element seemed in perfect harmony, neither of them dominating
the other. This is exactly what you want with a Sherry or wine finish of
previously Ex-Bourbon cask matured single malt.
There is a perfume wood polish smell, sweet honey-cream
sweets, Fruit chews and a slight pleasant copper smell perhaps. However, those red berry aromas remain up
front with Raspberries and other Red berries.
Despite its young age, there was no sign of either an
alcoholic nose nip or harsh tannic notes from this very competently produced red wine finished whisky.
Overall impression was bright, mouth-watering red fruity sweetness, and this
was carried over to the taste.
Tasting
A word of caution about adding water
Being that this is 46% abv, I naturally wanted to add a
touch of water but from experimentation, soon found that this wasn’t actually
necessary. Just as the Ben Eideann at 40% abv behaved more like 35% abv, so
this 46% abv Auchendores interestingly behaves more like a 40% abv whisky! I
haven’t got round to measuring the alcohol level myself (for fun purposes only
you understand), but somehow I would guess that we would see similar results showing
a few degrees of abv lower than stated on the bottle. (I wonder what this is all about?)
It is really satisfying when your expectations from the
aroma translate into the taste and this was definitely the case with this
Auchendores. Big mouth-watering red fruity flavours, balanced with the taste of
malty fruit cake. Raspberries, red-berries, a touch of cranberries perhaps,
dried glazed fruit, honey and wood spices.
Conclusion
This is very easy drinking whisky indeed and quite delicious.
No need to add water or to wait after pouring it from the bottle. It’s ready to
be enjoyed immediately. This highly approachable style will certainly endear it
and appeal to the many Kiddush Club casual whisky drinkers, who may be, (dare
I say), even tempted to say Kiddush over it on Shabbos morning
(with the bracha of SheHaKol of course!). I wouldn’t argue with them. But then, once you have returned from shul, a dram of this Auchendores would go very nicely with the first course of the Shabbos seuda, particularly with some chopped liver, eggs and onion. I can see someone getting through quite a few bottles of this.
Kiddush over Whisk[e]y?
At least in Shuls in the UK, it is quite common to
see people saying Kiddush over Blended Scotch Whisky on Shabbos day
“after the service” (as they say in England). Obviously, it is clear from the Shulchan
Aruch and Rambam, that Friday night Kiddush (being based on a
mitzvah DeOrita), should be said over wine, and if this is not available
for any reason, then over the Challos (Shabbos braded bread).
However, according to the Shulchan Aruch, Kiddush
Shabbos morning (which is 100% D'rabanan), should be said over wine,
and if this is not available, then Challa or Beer. The Mishna Berura
says that the preference should be beer, rather than Challa.
Most modern poskim would agree that Schnapps, Whiskey or
Whisky is considered a more choshuva (important and more dignified)
drink than beer and therefore one could argue that whisky would take priority over beer. Many Rabbonim
allow the use of whisk[e]y for Kiddush, even if red wine is available.
(I would personally say that if only grape juice or cheap
sweet red wine is available, then Scotch Whisky, even a Blend, would be the
preferred choice, but that’s me).
The question is now, what is the minimum quantity of whisky
you have to drink?
According to the Magen Avraham, a Reviis is required
for all types of “honoured“ beverage you would use to say Kiddush. That would
mean pouring at least about 90 (86cc) of whisky into a glass and drinking at
least half of that.
However, I believe that most Rabbonim today would
concur that actually, the way that whisky is usually drunk, (that is, using a
whisky glass and a minimum of 30cc of liquid), is the acceptable way for saying
Kiddush over whisky.
The next question is whether it is acceptable to pour a
standard 30-40cc “dram” into the bottom of a Glencairn glass or must it be
filled to the top, which would be the requirement of wine in a wine glass? The
concept, as I understand, is to send the message that by filling the glass up
to the very top, you have the intention of fulfilling the mitzvah to the full!
Perhaps therefore, it might be better to use one of those
shot glasses, (rather than pouring whisky into a Glencairn, a Copita or wine
glass), and fill this up to the top? This would certainly make sense with
Blended Scotch Whisky or other inferior drink like Schnapps or North American
whiskey, but would seem to me to be drinking in a disrespectful manner (and
therefore against the “spirit” of Kiddush), when it comes to Single
Malts!?
Well, that’s something to argue over at the next shul Kiddush,
please G-d, may it come very soon after this COVID pandemic is finally over.
NOTE: As always, please consult with your LROR, (Local Reliable Orthodox Rabbi) for what the practice is regarding saying Kiddush over whisk[e]y in your community.
Excellent sleuth work and very interesting. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteThanks Lawrence. I need to try and measure the ABV of this I'll use that table you sent me. Thanks again.
DeleteAs usual your review is thorough and informative. However, the question remains: is this bottle worth 230NIS?
ReplyDeleteI suppose that's for you to decide. If you compare them to say the Talisker Distillers Edition, finished in Sherry (NIS 300 ),
DeleteAberlour A'bunadh Sherry (NIS 550), Benromach 10 finished in Sherry (NIS 250), anCnoc 12 Wine Cask (NIS 230), Kilchoman Sanaig Wine Cask (NIS 299), Balvenie Double Wood (NIS 239), Glenfiddich Solera Reserve (NIS 229), Macallan 12 Double Cask (NIS 289), Tomatin Port Finish (NIS 249), Glenmorangie Lasanta (NIS 259).......then it seems very well prices, but when you then consider the extra cost of Kashrus supervision, it would seem cheap for what it is. Then again if it had been priced above NIS 300 I think it would have priced it self out the market. I suppose it depends on what you usually are prepared to pay for a whisky? If you stick to sub NIS 200 then all the above comparable sherry/wine finishes would be out of your price range. However, if you usually spend NIS 200-250 of this style of sweet fruity single malt then this kosher alternative is quite frankly, in my opinion, an absolute bargain.
Is it common for whisky to be aged in (non sherry) wine barrels?
ReplyDeleteIt never used to be as the wine casks tended to transfer flavour into the whisky which was far too intense, particularly mouth puckering tannins. However, since the development of the STR treatment for wine casks, which drastically reduces the dry wine effects, you are beginning to see more wine cask maturation. Eg. Bruichladdich, Kilchoman, Jura, Glen Garioch and many more. Non Scotch Wine Cask matured Single Malts are even more popular as 225 L French Oak Wine casks are readily available in many countries in Asia and Israel say, where as Bourbon and Spanish Sherry need to be imported at great expense. Hence almost all Kosher cask matured Single Malts are Red Wine (or Port Style) and not Sherry. Genuine Spanish Kosher Sherry is produced, as far as I know, by only two Bodegas and those are limited runs. It makes no sense when Israeli Kosher wine casks are so readily available and cheap.
DeleteThank you. Your responses are as fascinating as always.
Delete