(Tomintoul’s) Old Ballantruan 10-Year-Old versus Old Ballantruan (No Age Statement)
(Tomintoul’s) Old Ballantruan 10 Year Old and Non Age
Statement bottling
A few weeks ago I reviewed the excellent and slightly peated
BenRiach 16-Year-Old which I mentioned was very unusual for a Speyside. (If a Speyside distillery is going to produce a peaty malt they will almost always make it really peaty!).
The malted barley used to make almost all standard editions of Speyside whiskies (and indeed East Highlands whiskies as well), is entirely unpeated or almost completely unpeated. This has been the case since the turn of the 19th century when the railway broke through the borders of the Lowlands and reached the Highlands of Scotland, bringing with it cheap coal fuel.
The malted barley used to make almost all standard editions of Speyside whiskies (and indeed East Highlands whiskies as well), is entirely unpeated or almost completely unpeated. This has been the case since the turn of the 19th century when the railway broke through the borders of the Lowlands and reached the Highlands of Scotland, bringing with it cheap coal fuel.
Here is a link for great railway journeys through the
Highlands
Before this, all Highland whisky, like Island whisky today,
was heavily peated as peat was the only readily available fuel source which
could be used to dry the barley as well as heat the pot stills. The Islands and
Northern Highlands distilleries, where the railway could not reach, continued
to use peat to dry their malt and this is why coastal peaty whisky became the
classic style of these periphery regions.
In the Highlands of Scotland which includes Speyside, where
the majority of the Scotch whisky is produced, their classic style became light,
floral and fruity. Indeed, many Highland distilleries such as Glencadam,
established in 1825, (after the railway arrived in the Eastern Highlands), have always
been completely unpeated.
Today though, we have seen an increasing trend amongst
Speyside distilleries to produce special bottlings of heavily peated versions
of their whisky. There are a number of reasons for this. Peated single malts,
once thought to be a niche market have become hugely popular in recent years with
Islay and other Island distilleries such as Tobermory, Talisker, Scapa and
Highland Park, all struggling to meet demand. To try and cash in on this trend, Highland distilleries are now producing peated versions of whisky as marketing it as "old-Style" Speyside, as it would have been.
There is also an increased demand for peated malt whisky by
companies producing blended Scotch whisky as peated whiskies, blended with
their grain spirit, can contribute a substantial percentage of the flavour even
at a relatively young age. Consequently, Speyside and other mainland
distilleries, at the behest of their parent companies, have started to produce
special runs of peated whisky to go into blends in order to keep up with this demand.
Some of this whisky, (if we are lucky), ends up being bottled as special
edition single malts. These bottlings have become so popular that many Highlands and
Speyside distilleries such as BenRiach, Tomintoul, Balvenie, Glenrothes, Edradour
etc…now produce a certain percentage of their total annual output every year to
bottling peated versions of their whisky.
Curiously though, many of these distilleries bottle their
peated versions under other names. Tobermory’s peated expression is Ladaig,
(pronounced “Lechaig”), Edradour’s peated expression is called "Ballechin" and
Tomintoul’s is “Old Ballantruan”. No doubt they have their reasons.
When they do produce peated whisky the distilleries go whole
hog, with big heavily peated spirit of a minimum of 30 PPM or more, so (as mentioned earlier), it is rare to find
a slightly peated Highlander like BenRiach. The only other distilleries south of Inverness who I know of, that produce a lightly peated expression are Ardmore, (who lightly peat all their whisky to around 15 PPM),
and Tomintoul's Peaty Tang.
Tomintoul also produce two heavily peated whiskies and as
just mentioned, not under the name of Tomintoul but under the brand name “Old
Ballantruan”. They simply mention on the back label that the whisky comes from
a distillery in Tomintoul. (Hmmm, there is only one!)
I bought a bottle of Tomintoul Peaty Tang to try as I am a
fan of all Angus Dundee products, but unfortunately was not impressed. Unlike
the other lightly peated range of BenRiachs or the old Ardmore "Traditional Cask", (unfortunately now discontinued), which I think really compliment and
improve on the Highland/Speyside floral style, this Tomintoul doesn’t work for me. I would
guess it is peated to around 15-20 PPM. It has a significant and enticing smoky
peaty nose yet it fails to transfer particularly well to the flavour tasting,
translating into a typical Tomintoul floral fruity taste but with a slight
burnt almost plastic note in the background. I love Tomintoul but I’d give the Peaty Tang a miss.
Tomintoul distillery
Tomintoul distillery is not actually in the little mountain
village of Tomintoul but lies some 12 miles north on the B9136 via the A939.
Tomintoul village basically consists of a single main road called Main Street
which you have to drive through to reach the northern Speyside region.
However, it is still worth a stop there as they have an
excellent specialist whisky shop and tourist store, found on the main road
(obviously!) called “The Whisky Castle”. Here you will find special bottlings of
the local distilleries such as Tomintoul and Tamnavulin as well as many single
cask editions from independent bottlers. Prices vary from good to expensive
with the occasional bargain so always check before purchasing. It is an
excellent place for “Shalom Bayis” reasons. You can go browse the whisky
shelves whilst your dear wife is in the other side of the shop looking at
Scottish porcelain, crystal glass and other Scottish touristy gifts. A win-win
situation.
Tomintoul Distillery |
Tamnavulin Distillery nearby |
Tomintoul distillery itself does not have a visitor’s centre
although it is possible to get a private tour by appointment. We have
driven past both Tomintoul and Tamnavulin distillery (very nearby) a few times. Built in the 1960s, the buildings
don’t exactly look particularly appealingly aestheticly. They look more like some industrial chemical factory which in affect, they actually are when you strip all the marketing romance away...
Tomintoul distillery is owned by Angus Dundee who also own
Glencadam in the East Highlands. Someone
at Angus Dundee obviously loves Israel because you can readily obtain their
entire whisky range here in Israel, including all the limited editions and for
excellent prices.
All the Tomintouls have OU Kosher certifications (except the
Sherry/port finish expressions of course).
Their basic Tomintoul 10-Year-Old is found almost everywhere
and as low as NIS 150 is some places. It is cheap enough to persuade blended whisky
drinkers to give it a try. The 10-Year-Old is actually an excellent beginner’s
whisky being fruity, floral with a mild silky honey alcohol combination that slips down the
throat very easily. Not much of an aftertaste but a simply wonderful
introduction to the world of Single Malts. I have heard some Americans criticise
it though by describing it as too light and even "watery". What they mean of course is that it's not sickly sweet like the blends they usually drink. At Angus Dundee they
prefer to describe it as “Tomintoul - the gentle dram”. I prefer to describe it
as a graceful, subtle and great sipping whisky. (I don’t tend to add water to
this, it doesn’t need it).
If I was at a simcha (wedding, Bar Mitzva…), and had a
choice of Glenfiddich Rich Oak, Deanston Virgin, The Glenlivet NAS, Glenmorangie
10 and the Tomintoul 10-YO available, I’d reach for the "Gentle Dram" every time!
The next expressions in the range are the Peaty Tang
(already mentioned above) and the 14 and 16 Year old. These two are roughly the
same price but could not be more different. The 16-Year-Old is heavily coloured
and chill-filtered with an Irn Bru/Orange Tizer fake colour and bottled at the legal minimum of 40% abv. It is fruity and floral but heavier and very very caramel
sweet as if you can really taste that heavy Caramel E150a colouring. Those with a sweet tooth and little patience or imagination to go out of their "Glenlivet/Glenfiddich" comfort zone, should go for this. They will like it.
The 14-Year-Old however is 100% natural colour, (a beautiful pale straw
yellow just as it came out the Ex-Bourbon cask), non-chilled filtered for maximum flavour and bottled at a higher strength of 46% abv. It is Tomintoul as it was meant to be. Simply
delicious. It is light yet barley oily, rose petal floral, lemony, lemon grass,
heather honey, tropical fruits, a touch of glazed coconut…..simply yummy. This is not the place to start talking about Tomintoul's special editions and indeed that's enough talk of the standard Tomintoul range as we are here to review their heavily
peated sisters – The Old Ballantruans….
Well, I am fortunate enough to own both Old Ballantruan expressions
at the moment, so let’s compare them.
There is nothing subtle, kinda’ peaty or kinda’ tangy about
these Speyside bruisers from Tomintoul. Be under no illusion. They are well
within the league of the heavy weight Peat monsters like Laphroaig, Ardbeg and
Lagavulin and in some ways exceed them in peaty flavour. Old Ballantruan, although not stated on
the box, are rumoured to be peated to around 55 PPM and I wouldn’t be surprised
if it was more than that.
The back of these canisters is almost identical. Above the 10YO. Below the NAS. |
Notice the OU on teh bottom right. |
Recently, some good friend of ours suffered a terrible house
fire. (Baruch Hashem, everyone was OK). I was helping them go through their
things and I have to say that without any exaggeration, everything smelled of
Old Ballantruan smoke!
Island Versus Mainland Peat
Even the most seasoned whisky drinker would probably think
that peat smoke in whisky smells the same. Not true! You can definitely tell
the difference between Islay peat and mainland Highland peat.
Islay peat is salty sea air, briny and coastal like a bonfire and BBQ on
the beach. This comes from the seaweed and other sea plants and coastal
vegetation in the island’s earth.
Mainland peat has no such briny elements but
instead is more like burnt wood and scorched leaves and earth like a fire in the
middle of a mossy forest. Each has their own unique character.
Packaging Design:
I like the canister picture of farmers collecting barley in the field but I found the rest of he canister rather unaspiring. There is too much brown and black. The whisky simply doesn't stand out on the shelf. The writing is too clattered and I don't appreciate all that marketing waffle at the back. The bottle is no better with an almost totally black coloured bottle with plastic wrap thermal heat style label printed on the glass. (Tacky!) This printing process doesn't seem to have been very successful in any case as can be seen by the almost unintelligible text on the back.
No, I don't like the packaging design of the 10-Year-Old. The design of the non-peated Tomintouls are far better. I don't understand why they don't use a similar design? Why do they insist on these peated expressions being so completely different?
ABV level:
Both these expressions are bottled at a very high 50% abv and Tomintoul are to be commended for this. The higher the alcohol level, the more potential to preserve all those wonderful flavours.
Colour: a lovely pale rusty bronze to yellow.
Both whiskies proudly state NON-CHILLED-FILTERED on the
front label but alas, nothing about colour. It could well be natural colour but
without a statement it is difficult to tell. I suspect there is some E150a added. It is slightly “bronzy” but more natural looking than the Tomintoul 16.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Whiskies like these are not your run of the meal standard bottlings. They are for those who want that little bit more from their dram. Why don’t the marketing guys understand that NOT adding E150a in order to give it a Blended Whisky style fake tan and even if they haven't added, not bothering to state natural colour on the label, has a detrimental effect on their sales! It actually puts off the very demographic they are trying to attract.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Whiskies like these are not your run of the meal standard bottlings. They are for those who want that little bit more from their dram. Why don’t the marketing guys understand that NOT adding E150a in order to give it a Blended Whisky style fake tan and even if they haven't added, not bothering to state natural colour on the label, has a detrimental effect on their sales! It actually puts off the very demographic they are trying to attract.
This is what we want to see on all Tomintoul expressions!!!!
They just don’t seem to get it! Stating
“NON-CHILLED-FILTERED and NATURAL COLOUR” on the label and canister gets you to
stage II in the purchasing decision without any effort and it means less work
in the production process. Seeing these magic words prompts us whisky punters
to immediately reach out to grab this bottle from the shelf and examine
further.
Swirling the whisky around in the glass shows medium
viscosity with oily alcohol tears walling back into the glass slowly.
Smelling Notes:
Initial reaction: Lots and lots of hot smoky wood ash.
I was actually reviewing these whiskies with my youngest son.
He put the glass to his nose and immediately exclaimed “It reminds me of a staying
up all night, sitting in front of a Lag BeOmer medura (bonfire)”. He wasn’t
wrong!
After a few minutes your nose acclimatises somewhat to the
smoke and you start to notice subtler notes like sweet smoky barley, scorched
earth with farmyard wet hay and burnt wet leaves. The smell of fresh wood smoke
is ever present though. There is a definite barley character like burnt porridge
with milk and honey.
There is a slight alcohol heat and iodine character smelling
straight from the bottle. Adding a small drops of water however has a huge
effect and removes this nail polish remover smell completely. I would say that
for this whisky, water is an absolute must. With water the aromas explode.
There is the smell of lovely sweet new leather. Like brand new retzuah straps
and black paint on a pair of Tefillin.
Tasting Notes:
This whisky is very consistent with every smelling note
readily identifiable in the taste. Unlike the BenRiach 16 however, it is not
tasting notes on a background of peat. Oh No! This is an in-your-face peat
smoke and other flavours behind this.
That big heavy phenolic punch never recedes but you notice a
lovely slightly oily sweet barley cream texture and this starts to dominate. In
actual fact, get beyond the smoke and this whisky is quite fruity actually.
Steamed apple, pears apricots with white honey, black treacle and cinnamon. In the
background there is a lovely sweet aroma of fresh smoked leathery juicy beef
steak in a white wine marinade. This porridge transforms after a well into
melt-in-the-mouth shortcake butter biscuits, vanilla cream cakes with thick white
honey.
To say that the finish is long is an understatement. It is almost
permanent like a stain that won’t go away on your taste buds. Some people might
just find this slightly disconcerting. There is baked apple with soggy charred
leaves and damp scorched sweet wood sap and lots of spices covered in forest
ash, treacle and wood sap.
Old Ballantruan Non Age Statement, 50% abv.
Non-Chilled-Filtered. OU Kosher Certification. (NIS 390)
Packaging Design:
Despite being a similer almost entirely brown colour all over, the Non-Age-Statement (NAS) expression's canister and especially the bottle I think is somehow more attractive. I just love that oldy-worldy Victorian style front label. The rest of the design seems rushed and poorly thought out. Everything looks too squashed.
The label is the traditional paper stick on design which is far better than the 10-Year-Old's frankly weird plastic wrap thing. Maybe it seemed a good idea in the pub at the time? At least with the traditional printed label of the NAS you can actually read the back label!
Interestingly I noticed that the NAS back label show the OU symbol whereas the the 10-Year-Old doesn't. (The OU is printed at the back of both canisters though so "no worries"!)
My comments above about colour applies equally to this
expression as well. Putting these two whiskies side-by-side I certainly
cannot tell the difference. Is this a sign of E150a colouring making sure that both expressions are a consistant colour, or just the fact
that at Tomintoul, they are using the same type Ex-Bourbon casks?
If anything this NAS expression is slightly more oily than the 10-Year-Old showing slower alcohol tears falling down the sides after a gentle swirl in the glass.
Nosing:
If anything, the smoke is even more intense with the
Non-Age-Statement expression. Despite being the same Peat PPM levels, this peat
smoke is harsher, harder and fresher. It makes the 10-Year-Old actually seem quite
soft in comparison. This smoke is less like a forest after a fire and much
closer to what it actually is, that is, peat dried malted barley! It is just like
sticking your head in a vat of warm heavily peated malted barley straight off
of the malting floor. Yes, I have smelled this at a distillery. In fact, the
whole smell of this whisky reminds me so much of the smells around a working
distillery with peated barley, peated grist and flour with watery porridge
mixed with WD40 machine oil.
Interestingly, the overall effect is a crunchier barley experience
and less fruity than the 10-Year-Old. There is a taste of dry unpolished wood
like an old Scottish farmhouse. No leather flavours but rather slightly charred
veal sausages with barbeque brown honey sauce and covered in charcoal wood
embers left over from a meat barbeque the night before. A drier white heather
honey is there with a touch of bee’s wax. Again, the taste of apple is very distinct
but it’s dried chewy apple slices and delicious roasted almonds mixed together
with chewy treacle. It reminds me very much of those breakfast cereal bars so popular
in my son’s yeshiva. You see them scattered around the tables in the Beis
Midrash. When they are deeply involved in a sugya and do not wish to leave the
Beis Midrash to go and eat, these bars keep them going.
Finish is long and satisfying. More roasted barley, roasted
almonds, apple, cinnamon and treacle, all wrapped up in sweet smoky ash.
Conclusions
The 10-Year-Old has the aroma of a furniture store with
sofas, arm chairs and dressers with the smell of new leather and polished wood
all around.
The NAS is more like a Spice shop I know in Geula, Meir Sha’arim,
with fresh spices, dry fruits and freshly roasted nuts, oh and somehow I have
to fit in the smell of charred wood in this analogy. OK, OK, you visit Geula the
morning after Lag BaOmer with sweet smoke still thick in the air. (That will do
it!)
The 10-Year-Old seems fruitier or at least there are more
wet stewed fruity flavours as opposed to dry fruits of the NAS expression. The 10-Year-Old
is gentler, softer and more laid back. The NAS is spicier which is surprising
when you must assume that the 10-Year-Old has spent longer in wood.
The NAS shows flavours of charcoaled sausages and roasted
barley and nuts in a honey brown Barbeque sauce whereas the 10-Year-Old is more
charred soft barbequed juicy steak a white wine and fruit juice marinade.
So which one do I prefer? Well for ideological reasons I
really wanted to say the Aged Statement 10-Year-Old but in all honesty I can’t.
The NAS has more going on and is overall a more interesting and ultimately
a more enjoyable whisky. The 10Y has a lot going for it but compared to the NAS,
it is slightly flatter somehow with less complexity.
It is important to realise that these are subtle differences
and I heartily recommend both expressions. Despite having a £10 price
difference in the UK, the NAS at £35 to the 10-Year-Old at £45, here in Israel,
I’ve seen the 10-Year-Old going for slightly cheaper!
Peat monsters they are but very different to Islay monsters
and although lacking any coastal element, they show other flavour notes that
almost make up for it. As enjoyable as they are and I certainly will try and
make sure I have at least one of these in my whisky collection, I’m a sucker
for those sea weedy briny flavours of Islay and would therefore rate the best
of Islay higher. That’s my own personal preference. Tomintoul have produced two
great full flavoured whiskies here, more than enough to satisfy the hardest of hardcore Peathead whisky lover. Kol HaKavod!
Comments
Post a Comment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please enter your comment above this line, and then click on the PUBLISH button (on the far right hand side).